<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33595714.post116815145068043985..comments</id><updated>2008-02-28T00:51:31.129+08:00</updated><title type='text'>Comments on 新春秋 PANDEMONIUM: 談粵語正音</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://daimones.blogspot.com/feeds/116815145068043985/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33595714/116815145068043985/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://daimones.blogspot.com/2007/01/blog-post_116815145068043985.html'/><author><name>K.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16056406181814283736</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>6</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33595714.post-5733655782509225278</id><published>2008-02-28T00:51:00.000+08:00</published><updated>2008-02-28T00:51:00.000+08:00</updated><title type='text'>《商務新詞典》摒棄了十八年來對粵音「兼收並蓄、以現代通行讀音為主」的取向，在最新版本 (2008年1...</title><content type='html'>《商務新詞典》摒棄了十八年來對粵音「兼收並蓄、以現代通行讀音為主」的取向，在最新版本 (2008年1月) 中，改為「參考何文匯博士《粵音正讀字彙》」。</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33595714/116815145068043985/comments/default/5733655782509225278'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33595714/116815145068043985/comments/default/5733655782509225278'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://daimones.blogspot.com/2007/01/blog-post_116815145068043985.html?showComment=1204131060000#c5733655782509225278' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://daimones.blogspot.com/2007/01/blog-post_116815145068043985.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33595714.post-116815145068043985' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33595714/posts/default/116815145068043985' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33595714.post-116845722226439340</id><published>2007-01-11T03:27:00.000+08:00</published><updated>2007-01-11T03:27:00.000+08:00</updated><title type='text'>題外話︰為甚麼我一直被教作讀「名」王星？冥字不是讀陽平的嗎……？看來我也受了正音毒了。</title><content type='html'>題外話︰為甚麼我一直被教作讀「名」王星？冥字不是讀陽平的嗎……？看來我也受了正音毒了。</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33595714/116815145068043985/comments/default/116845722226439340'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33595714/116815145068043985/comments/default/116845722226439340'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://daimones.blogspot.com/2007/01/blog-post_116815145068043985.html?showComment=1168457220000#c116845722226439340' title=''/><author><name>Lestsariel</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17263009242717157666</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://daimones.blogspot.com/2007/01/blog-post_116815145068043985.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33595714.post-116815145068043985' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33595714/posts/default/116815145068043985' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33595714.post-116823573987760302</id><published>2007-01-08T13:55:00.000+08:00</published><updated>2007-01-08T13:55:00.000+08:00</updated><title type='text'>想不到新春秋又多一個猛料主人,可喜可賀其實舉個例,顧紀筠,現在係人都讀顧紀(均),但我們讀溫庭筠的時...</title><content type='html'>想不到新春秋又多一個猛料主人,可喜可賀&lt;BR/&gt;其實舉個例,顧紀筠,現在係人都讀顧紀(均),但我們讀溫庭筠的時候不會讀溫庭(均),此其一&lt;BR/&gt;第二,銘字,現在姓名中有銘字的人大部份都讀冥而非名&lt;BR/&gt;既然人地個名鍾意咁叫,何博士何必嘥gas去糾正人地的讀音?&lt;BR/&gt;其次何博士「用粵音來切《廣韻》的中古音，大致上很準確，但也常有不盡相符的地方。」,首先我不記得那一位學者有本廣韻叢考,入面羅列了一大堆廣韻的異讀字,何解何博士甚麼都要定于一尊?其次根據馬伯樂的唐代長安方言考,接近唐代長洛官話的並非粵語,而是吳語,第三,難道只有粵語先最接近中古廣韻?潮州話沒有撮口呼、唇齒音及舌上音,那末為甚麼你何博士不教人用潮州話正香港話?潮州話放字係b聲母,廣東話乃撮口的f聲母,所以荏苒軒主人講得啱,唔好下下以為廣東話大晒。又例如我們講孔子的知之為知之,不知為不知,用潮州話讀,知與之便不同音,因此所謂「粵音是《廣韻》系統的遺裔」其實只是一種粵語優秀論的中心主義論調。甚至有些香港句法或者字彙,根本與現代漢語規範不相稱,例如舉個例:「果邊隻mou屎拎畀我呀唔該」,這句用sov去挑已經夠你挑了,我們又把mouse的s尾音拖長變成了si,那末何博士為點解唔玩盡佢,連呢d都埋?&lt;BR/&gt;其實我地呢度d挑正音正字的文都夠出一本書仔,唔知各位有無興趣?</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33595714/116815145068043985/comments/default/116823573987760302'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33595714/116815145068043985/comments/default/116823573987760302'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://daimones.blogspot.com/2007/01/blog-post_116815145068043985.html?showComment=1168235700000#c116823573987760302' title=''/><author><name>舒爾賽</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07231467515948675182</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='13257491661496062597'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://daimones.blogspot.com/2007/01/blog-post_116815145068043985.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33595714.post-116815145068043985' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33595714/posts/default/116815145068043985' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33595714.post-116816808693433690</id><published>2007-01-07T19:08:00.000+08:00</published><updated>2007-01-07T19:08:00.000+08:00</updated><title type='text'>拉雜談談，豈敢承倉海君謬獎。謝謝你的寶貴的意見。:)</title><content type='html'>拉雜談談，豈敢承倉海君謬獎。謝謝你的寶貴的意見。:)</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33595714/116815145068043985/comments/default/116816808693433690'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33595714/116815145068043985/comments/default/116816808693433690'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://daimones.blogspot.com/2007/01/blog-post_116815145068043985.html?showComment=1168168080000#c116816808693433690' title=''/><author><name>荏苒軒主人</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02654808956932084184</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='05484938941234936070'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://daimones.blogspot.com/2007/01/blog-post_116815145068043985.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33595714.post-116815145068043985' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33595714/posts/default/116815145068043985' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33595714.post-116816563722815854</id><published>2007-01-07T18:27:00.000+08:00</published><updated>2007-01-07T18:27:00.000+08:00</updated><title type='text'>這世上，有兩種人是最幸福的。一種是天真(naive)的人，而另人種是無知(ignorant)的人。為...</title><content type='html'>這世上，有兩種人是最幸福的。&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;一種是天真(naive)的人，而另人種是無知(ignorant)的人。&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;為什麼是最幸福呢??&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;幸福在他們什麼都不知道，對整個世界沒有太深的了解，永遠也看不到真實，因現實永遠都是殘酷的。&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;回想起，從前自己也是這兩種人，但這兩種幸福相比起現在的幸福，也只不過是最低層次的幸福。&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;現在的幸福優勝在，看到現實之餘，又能在憤世嫉俗的心態下學會知足，這種幸福實在是無與倫比。&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;美好的事每個人也能幻想得到，但真實不是每個人也能看得到!!&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;能看到真實也是另一種幸福，那種幸福來得更實在。&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;在亂世中，我還能安穩的活下來，每天要承受的可能只是繁重的工作和疲累，或對人事上的厭倦，但相比起世界上其他人的痛苦和不安，我這些只是皮毛而已。&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;誰不想低低bb的度日，但問題是人總要成長，世界每天都在趨速我們長大!!</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33595714/116815145068043985/comments/default/116816563722815854'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33595714/116815145068043985/comments/default/116816563722815854'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://daimones.blogspot.com/2007/01/blog-post_116815145068043985.html?showComment=1168165620000#c116816563722815854' title=''/><author><name>我愛陳列品</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15788078576881041749</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='18167171279996361147'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://daimones.blogspot.com/2007/01/blog-post_116815145068043985.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33595714.post-116815145068043985' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33595714/posts/default/116815145068043985' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33595714.post-116815402521937905</id><published>2007-01-07T15:13:00.000+08:00</published><updated>2007-01-07T15:13:00.000+08:00</updated><title type='text'>鴻文字斟句酌，內容翔實，較諸當世好奇穿鑿之學風，倍覺可貴。然「任」姓讀「淫」，近代固有顯例：任劍輝即...</title><content type='html'>鴻文字斟句酌，內容翔實，較諸當世好奇穿鑿之學風，倍覺可貴。然「任」姓讀「淫」，近代固有顯例：任劍輝即作此音，豈忘之乎？惟瑕不掩瑜，雅論信而有徵，何傷？若何博士之徒，將身名俱滅，不廢江河萬古也。</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33595714/116815145068043985/comments/default/116815402521937905'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33595714/116815145068043985/comments/default/116815402521937905'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://daimones.blogspot.com/2007/01/blog-post_116815145068043985.html?showComment=1168153980000#c116815402521937905' title=''/><author><name>倉海君</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17212577823407511988</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='03286906706563438129'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://daimones.blogspot.com/2007/01/blog-post_116815145068043985.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33595714.post-116815145068043985' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/33595714/posts/default/116815145068043985' type='text/html'/></entry></feed>