tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33595714.post8352492102874712076..comments2023-12-02T18:39:25.382+08:00Comments on 新春秋 PANDEMONIUM: 廢稿 (三)Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33595714.post-91091554292796232072009-07-24T02:37:47.175+08:002009-07-24T02:37:47.175+08:00世界有你條仆街,也是無可奈何的.世界有你條仆街,也是無可奈何的.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33595714.post-18314496774587935702009-07-24T02:10:02.840+08:002009-07-24T02:10:02.840+08:00我只是寫一下爛文來娛己娛眾而已, 兄台也不必深究那些荒謬的理論.
在科幻世界裡, 就算北極有企鵝,...我只是寫一下爛文來娛己娛眾而已, 兄台也不必深究那些荒謬的理論.<br /><br />在科幻世界裡, 就算北極有企鵝, 南極有熱帶魚, 亞馬遜有北極熊, 也是無可奈何的.mr. chowhttp://www.safariunderground.net/movie/movie_chi/2046/2046.jpgnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33595714.post-14626429475947681972009-07-23T11:51:41.642+08:002009-07-23T11:51:41.642+08:00偶然路過,看到這精彩文章, 不得不佩服周生?(小姐?)之深厚學養, 文筆功力深厚, 內容有情理.哲理...偶然路過,看到這精彩文章, 不得不佩服周生?(小姐?)之深厚學養, 文筆功力深厚, 內容有情理.哲理.科理...<br />只是對6.42之說法有點保留, 總覺得每一個人都是獨特, 任何學術系統沒法演繹包括所有人.說到底,我不認為時間與記憶是等量.或者說,記憶.時間.可以量化,但不等於兩者可以相量.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33595714.post-35097775326307015692009-07-22T21:58:54.162+08:002009-07-22T21:58:54.162+08:00我完全不明白你們在幹什麼?這是什麼地方?我完全不明白你們在幹什麼?這是什麼地方?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33595714.post-82295777545158628472009-07-22T20:01:39.522+08:002009-07-22T20:01:39.522+08:00:) 呀...啊..
終於明白發生甚麼事!
記憶只不過是你的野心之動力, 時空的遺忘只是不想再吶...:) 呀...啊..<br />終於明白發生甚麼事!<br />記憶只不過是你的野心之動力, 時空的遺忘只是不想再吶喊。Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33595714.post-50944700970773113272009-07-20T20:16:53.298+08:002009-07-20T20:16:53.298+08:00A great ambition indeed you have.A great ambition indeed you have..bwd.https://www.blogger.com/profile/17146083662285802894noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33595714.post-69289533372790258042009-07-20T00:02:23.827+08:002009-07-20T00:02:23.827+08:00in some sense you're correct, actually i'm...in some sense you're correct, actually i'm making sort of this:<br /><br />https://hihv3q.blu.livefilestore.com/y1m9uPi24t_S4gsdf0a12OMdINcO2D3WC0UBeeviEtLd4jHzsW37GQGi9IjhKSGuUewKnLkSFCOo4u-WgOQ_zmoL4TUdaPMOBmBFUAT87AV8ZPAaEo5jAgdy8CCfk02iS4eZpITKcU_v0f5R_bUO7vWmA/%E9%BB%91%E5%8D%92.jpgmr. chowhttps://hihv3q.blu.livefilestore.com/y1m9uPi24t_S4gsdf0a12OMdINcO2D3WC0UBeeviEtLd4jHzsW37GQGi9IjhKSGuUewKnLkSFCOo4u-WgOQ_zmoL4TUdaPMOBmBFUAT87AV8ZPAaEo5jAgdy8CCfk02iS4eZpITKcU_v0f5R_bUO7vWmA/%E9%BB%91%E5%8D%92.jpgnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33595714.post-81063360533298587962009-07-18T02:30:25.977+08:002009-07-18T02:30:25.977+08:00Do you think 6.12 is 6.12 or 6.111?
Do you think ...Do you think 6.12 is 6.12 or 6.111?<br /><br />Do you think 6.2 and 6.4 can actually be merged?<br /><br />It would be interesting to illustrate 6.4 with mathematics.<br /><br />"Wittgenstein once said that a serious and philosophical work could be written that would consist entirely of jokes". Are you trying to do things of the sort?.bwd.https://www.blogger.com/profile/17146083662285802894noreply@blogger.com