tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33595714.post2852972281034200129..comments2023-12-02T18:39:25.382+08:00Comments on 新春秋 PANDEMONIUM: 談好戲量事件Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33595714.post-22336142378942367802010-07-14T17:14:40.371+08:002010-07-14T17:14:40.371+08:00有個"網路兼職"機會替自己加薪,增加存款!
給自己一個機會深入瞭解吧!
免費索取...有個"網路兼職"機會替自己加薪,增加存款!<br />給自己一個機會深入瞭解吧!<br />免費索取在家網路兼職資料 。<br /><a href="http://joe80411.weebly.com/" rel="nofollow">http://joe80411.weebly.com/</a><br />祝~天天都是有美好的一天˙快樂與您同在<br />PS:謝謝您的閱讀。如果您不感興趣,很抱歉打擾您!!Internet business at home automated systemhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06049803326937537920noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33595714.post-52042631183316761842008-09-05T14:52:00.000+08:002008-09-05T14:52:00.000+08:00to be honest, i'm disappointed by both parties...to be honest, i'm disappointed by both parties (theater & net users).<BR/><BR/>1. the theater has attitude problems. it should LISTEN to the public's opinions and adjust its way of operation. it doesn't mean to compromise the theater's purposes but is a healthy interaction (since it so emphasises on interaction) with the public, which can lead to a win win situation.<BR/><BR/>i only watched a few videos of their 'street art' on youtube and would say the acting was just fair. i wouldn't mind cos the actors' not paid or trained (i guess) but i'm not too sure about the content. though some say they're not art, they still claim themself an 'art organisation' so please behave yourself as you not only represent your org but ALL artists around the world. <BR/><BR/>2. many net users' not really care about anything as long as they can walk freely in MK (as they said in the FB group). they didn't try to think in the theater's position (as they would say the theater itself didn't think in their position either, and so the public's not any better than the theater) and improve the situation but to attack and destroy anything that's on their way. im not saying all, but many net users.<BR/><BR/>last thing i wanna say, i'm not too familiar with what the theater's aims are, as i only came across them with their freeze acts in times square (which the idea's originally from Improv Everywhere) and also saw the performance in the infamous gigabytes m192, which i also found huge similarities from Improv's food court musical (and ironically, Improv's received much much better compliments). Improv's aim is just being funny and humorous and creating scenes. but this theater also performs other acts sth about 'girlfriend' and stuffs, so what exactly this org is about???Crimsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08623246690160894003noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33595714.post-73138913310892703092008-08-28T15:21:00.000+08:002008-08-28T15:21:00.000+08:00我也覺得方潤兄根本不是在支持或反對好戲量,他是在質疑反對者的表達手法方潤兄這次真有點被冤枉我也覺得方潤兄根本不是在支持或反對好戲量,他是在質疑反對者的表達手法<BR/><BR/>方潤兄這次真有點被冤枉Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33595714.post-16279865082711440752008-08-28T10:11:00.000+08:002008-08-28T10:11:00.000+08:00呢次事件 莫過於令人聯想起九龍皇帝 曾灶財先生由於塗污公物被多次檢控 亦有廣告商 設計師向佢招手在外...呢次事件 莫過於令人聯想起九龍皇帝 曾灶財先生<BR/><BR/>由於塗污公物被多次檢控 亦有廣告商 設計師向佢招手<BR/><BR/>在外間毀譽參半 不過 亦不致於惹人生厭<BR/><BR/>反觀好戲量的表演質數有多到達這種程度?<BR/><BR/>5年的表演換來被人「踢走」 <BR/><BR/>答案都呼之欲出了Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33595714.post-68100591297549074552008-08-28T09:24:00.000+08:002008-08-28T09:24:00.000+08:001. 既是「比喻」,主角當然可以與此事無關。我未聽過比喻也要找個有關係的。2. 我針對的是「踢走」,...1. 既是「比喻」,主角當然可以與此事無關。我未聽過比喻也要找個有關係的。<BR/><BR/>2. 我針對的是「踢走」,這點已經多次闡述。<BR/>該group之後放棄「好戲量離開旺角」的宗旨,我亦已停止批評他們。<BR/>如果說我未明網民意思,那麼閣下也一樣未明在下意思。<BR/><BR/>我講左N咁多次,我唔識好戲量、冇睇過佢地亦唔「支持」佢地。我反對既只係「踢走」,唔係反對你地批評/反對/杯葛佢,你唔打算趕走人我就唔理,明唔明﹖方潤https://www.blogger.com/profile/01957894869706622370noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33595714.post-60595845004550941722008-08-28T04:59:00.000+08:002008-08-28T04:59:00.000+08:00好聞好聞Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-33595714.post-14581434953306306142008-08-27T19:36:00.001+08:002008-08-27T19:36:00.001+08:00冇乜留意facebook動態,唔講重以為係劇團曬馬攪大型表演+會員聚會冇乜留意facebook動態,唔講重以為係劇團曬馬攪大型表演+會員聚會Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com